A systematic review of the safety and effectiveness of fast-track cardiac anesthesia.
نویسندگان
چکیده
COST containment and efficient resource use have forced anesthesiologists to rethink their management strategies for cardiac surgery. In the late 1970s, when anesthetic practice predominantly involved inhalational anesthesia, it was possible to extubate cardiac surgical patients within a few hours after surgery. However, there was no economic pressure or incentive to practice cost-effective medicine at that time. An opioid-based anesthetic regimen gained popularity in the 1980s, when studies confirmed its ability to allow hemodynamic stability, even in patients with marginal cardiac reserve. This necessitated continuation of postoperative ventilatory support for 12–24 h in cardiac surgical patients. The growing need for intensive cardiovascular and ventilatory support during the immediate postoperative period in these patients required an expansion of intensive care unit (ICU) bed availability. Until recently, this need for postoperative ICU nursing care and length of stay had continued unchecked. The aims of “fast-tracking” cardiac surgical patients include early tracheal extubation and decreased length of ICU and hospital stay with subsequent cost reduction. Fast-track cardiac anesthesia (FTCA) techniques include the use of short-acting hypnotic drugs, reduced doses of opioids, or the use of ultrashort-acting opioids, and, in some cases, the use of antifibrinolytic drugs or drugs to prevent atrial fibrillation. There are purported benefits of early tracheal extubation and reduced duration of mechanical ventilation. Several randomized trials have found that early tracheal extubation can be safely achieved, and it may lead to reduced ICU stay and costs. Despite these findings, there are residual concerns regarding early tracheal extubation and FTCA. Studies to date have not included a sufficient number of patients to detect a clinically important effect on serious morbidity or mortality. The primary objective of this systematic review was to determine whether FTCA is as safe as traditional cardiac anesthesia (TCA) based on the administration of high doses of opioids. The hypothesis tested was that there is not an increased risk of mortality or major morbidity associated with FTCA compared with TCA.
منابع مشابه
A systematic review of the effectiveness of catheter ablation NavX mapping system for treatment of the cardiac arrhythmia
Background: Catheter ablation is widely used for treatment of atrial fibrillation. The use of fluoroscopic and non-fluoroscopic mapping systems in catheter ablation is common. This study conducted to investigate the safety and effectiveness of Navx non-fluoroscopic mapping system. Methods : In this study, the appropriate electronic databases including Cochrane Library and Ovid Medline searc...
متن کاملThe safety and effectiveness of the current treatment regimen with or without roflumilast in advanced COPD patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Background: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a chronic respiratory disease, which reduces the lung function and causes respiratory symptoms over time, and it is primarily associated with shortness of breath, cough and sputum production. Roflumilast, which is a long-acting selective inhibitor, reduces the anti-inflammatory effect of the main symptoms of COPD. The aim of ...
متن کاملA systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials on saffron (Crocus sativus) effectiveness and safety on erectile dysfunction and semen parameters
Objective: We performed this systematic review and meta-analysis study to determine saffron (Crocus sativus) effectiveness and safety in male infertility problems. Materials and Methods: The databases PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, Google Scholar, SID, IranMedex and Magiran until July 2016 and reference section of relevant articles, were searched to find both English and Persian clinical trials on m...
متن کاملComparison of the addition of fentanyl and sufentanil to anesthesia and its effects on urinary retention after spinal anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Introduction: two drugs, fentanyl and sufentanil, are drugs added to the anesthetic trial, which have been used more than other drugs, however, there is still no detailed information about the safety of adding these two drugs to the anesthetic drug in the event of urinary retention in Therefore, the present study was conducted with the aim of comparing the addition of fentanyl and sufentanil to...
متن کاملThe effectiveness and safety of Iranian herbal medicines for treatment of premenstrual syndrome: A systematic review
Objective: Premenstrual syndrome (PMS) is one of the most common problems among women of reproductive age. The popularity of complementary/alternative therapies has grown in recent years, and these treatments have been more commonly used by women (48.9%) than men (37.8%). The aim of this systematic review was to assess effectiveness and safety of Iranian herbal medicines for treatment of premen...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Anesthesiology
دوره 99 4 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2003